THE BATTLE AGAINST MUSLIM ASCENDANCY .





THE FIGHT AGAINST MUSLIM ASCENDANCY

There is a quiet truth hidden from public view. It is that minorities hide their hatred and animosities until they become a majority or at least until they acquire sufficient power after which they can strike out at their perceived oppressors. Then they expose themselves. And it's not just Muslims that threaten us. At the end of this article take a moment to read the UPDATE: comments by Hispanic/Mexican leaders in America in 2010. Very interesting.

ON THE MATTER OF THE NYC MOSQUE

Does anyone wonder why the Muslims are so persistent about building that "Community Center & Mosque" in that particular location, very near to Ground Zero?

I would think any normal group, if they were a minority trying to assimilate into a majority and "just trying to get along", would have responded to the Mosque outcry in just the opposite manner. They would try to avoid confrontation with the majority that surrounds them. What, they would ask themselves, is so important to us that we want to deliberately aggravate them to build our Mosque "here"? What's is so important about this particular "spot" that we risk alienating ourselves from those we came here to bind with? Can we not find another less-polarizing "spot" to build? Especially since we have been offered all kinds of economic advantages to do so?

So I ask myself again, what is it about this "spot" that makes it so important to us over all others to the point that we are willing to suffer the antagonism of so many of our future neighbors to build here? That doesn't make sense to me. Even acknowledging that we have the "right to build here", does that not mean also that we have the right "not to build here"? I would think so. So either way, we are exercising our "rights". I fear something doesn't add up here.

Consider this: a Jewish [terror] group bombs an Arab building somewhere in the West Bank and a few years later, Israel buys the plot and announces its intention to build a national synagogue on that site. Think the locals might object? Think they might even react violently? I think so.

So if a large number of the local people demonstrate their animosity to such a plan, should Israel continue with its plan to build there? We assume they have the legal right to do so, but the question is should they do so? And if they did proceed, how in the world could that turn out well?

No, if they were smart, and they were offered another site, they would accept that new site and relocate their synagogue. But if their plan actually was to gloat about their previous victory in this spot, if their plan was political rather than religious, then indeed they would try to go ahead with their plan, acceptance or not. Their true motive would then be exposed!

You see the answer is that there is much more behind building this Mosque on this site than you are being told. In fact, this is very symbolic to someone, so much so that they are willing to endure all kinds of reprobation and acrimony to build it there. They want it there; they want it as close to Ground Zero as they can get it.

But why? If you think it's because they want to please their fellow Americans or because they want to assimilate into the local America's local mainstream, you are delusional. They know the reaction of the local population and they don't care. It is their agenda that they care about and believe me, they have one. And it's obvious: it is being sold "back home" as a symbol of heir huge victory over the Infidels.

It is only certain politicians that pretend not to recognize this. They choose not to understand either because of greed (Mayor Bloomberg with his financial interests in the Middle East) or fear of Muslim violence (most everyone else). It could also be that they believe they can appease the Muslims by supporting them in this matter but if that's it, they are making another big mistake. All appeasement will do is convince the vast number of "radical" Muslims that we are weak and no longer to be feared and that will lead to more acts of violence against us, not less. Bullies, including religious bullies, are not dissuaded by appeasement, they are emboldened by it.

Folks, remember what most politicians are: they are people that can talk out of both sides of their mouths without having to believe a word they are saying. In other words they say what they think you want to hear so you will vote for them. If they weren't like that, they could never get elected. The basic rule is: talk but try not to say anything specific because specifics can and will be held against you.

Don't leave it up to them to make any real decisions for you. Such decisions are better left to the people aided and abetted by their leaders. I trust the collective people more than the collective politicians we send to Washington. Hell, they are seldom right about anything anyway.

Remenber, with politicians, hindsight gives them the best insight.

What a mess.

Sharia law is the law that permits wife burning, honor killings (of children) and the suppression of women's rights. There are so many Muslims in England now that the esteemed Archbishop decided they needed their own law, separate from the law of the rest of England. What the good Archbishop didn't (and probably still doesn't) understand is that compromising in many cases leads to capitulation. You open the door a few inches and the other guy will kick the door in.

Tides in humanity are like a great floods. If allowed to begin, hey seldom can be stopped until they run their course. Islam today may be such a tide. If it is, anyone in the way of the flood will die.

The handwriting is on the wall. And for those who think it can't or won't happen, I say, ignore the warnings at your own and your children's peril.

So what's the point? The point is that when I hear that "most Muslims" are "decent people" so we don't have to worry, I get sick to my stomach. Of course they are. They always are. But that won't matter because "most" Muslims will never stand up against the radicals. Why not? Because most ordinary people are not equipped to deal with violent, hate-filled, or fanatical young men that want to strike out at someone for whatever reason. So they protect themselves by getting out of the way. It happened in Czarist Russia, Nazi Germany, and Mao's China. Revolution in all those countries was fomented by a small group of dedicated, violent activists, not by the silent majorities.

If you want a close-up of what's going on, take a trip and visit a Mosque in London during services. You will find the Mosque crowded. Look at the people there. Most of them are not potential suicide bombers. But that doesn't matter because some of them are and they are the main speakers. Regular people shut up to stay out of trouble. And when push comes to shove and all hell breaks out - as it has in various countries in Europe in the past 10 years – all those so-called "good Muslims" we talk about, will hide inside their homes while the young toughs riot in the streets. If you are going to put your future into the hands of those "good" Muslims, I wish you and your family the very best of luck. You are going to need it.

But it is not just Muslims. Here is an UPDATE from 2010. This one concerns the flood of Mexicans and how they behave when they come to America. Read their comments and weap. These are real:

HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT
2010-09-27

HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT

Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die . . Through love of having children, we are going to take over.

Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We will take them over . . . We are here to stay."

Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."

Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it."

Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember 187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California."

Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . . . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."

Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California." [that means "taking back"]

Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood [only] by Latinos . . . "

So, are these just the words of extremists? Nope, we could fill up many pages with such quotes. These are mainstream Mexican leaders.

THE U.S. VS MEXICO:
On February 15, 1998, the U.S. And Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country. They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. Flags were held upside down. As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. Team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. Players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S. Team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."
(The Americans were strangers in their own land. All this thanks to Democrats.)

Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative action or racial privilege. The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent. Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated. Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants.

Even corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and third world immigrants should get special, privileged status. Some examples are Exxon, Texaco, Merrill Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber, Starbucks and many more. Why? Maybe cheaper labor means bigger profits???

DID YOU KNOW?:
Did you know that Mexico has NEVER extradited a Mexican national accused of murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so? Not once.

Is education important to you? Here are the words of a teacher who spent over 20 years in the Los Angeles School system. "Imagine teachers in classes containing 30-40 students of widely varying attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent in English. Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the majority of students and that means fewer words and math problems and more pictures and multicultural references."

When I was young, I remember hearing about the immigrants that came through Ellis Island. They wanted to learn English. They wanted to breathe free. They wanted to become Americans.

Now too many immigrants come here with demands. They demand to be taught in their own language. They demand special privileges--affirmative action. They demand ethnic studies that glorify their culture.

Makes you wonder, if they loved their homeland so much, why the hell did they leave in the first place?

Joey
http://www.blogger.com/profile/00659050837324784709
Where people come to exercise their minds.

Ps And don’t let them call this a “bigoted” piece. That's a device to disarm you. This is a realistic and honest evaluation of a very challenging situation. That’s what it is. And if you want to know the truth, the "good" Muslims are as frightened of their radical friends as we are.

Followers